The film
of Al Midan is a good work in terms of explaining the pre revolution term and
revolution process.However on explaining
the after revolution term, it is really
not objective.
If we
consider the protests ,which took place different region’s of Egypt in 2011,aiming
primarily ousting Mübarek,we can see that a lot of different groups which are
Egyptians were all together.Salafi,secular,islamist,Christian and all other
groups came together to provide a better future for their children. Until
Mübarek was overthrowned, different groups generally achieved to find a middle
ground by ignoring their differences.Thanks to all differnet groups’ sacrifices
and blood they reached their prior aim, resigning of Hosni Mubarak.
After resigning
of Mubarak, most of protesters leaved from square. However, leaving Mubarak’s
was only a deceptive iniciative of regime. Military government took power and
they continued govern country with same constitution, same policies and same
attitudes against public.Some conscious protesters understood that leaving
square after resigning Mubarak was a strategical fault.They should have not
leaved the square until they provide fundamental changes in constitution,institutions
and mentality of management group.They understood that actually with leaving of
Mubarak nothing was changed. Before army seized power, public respected to
army. Even some groups thought that they achieved revolution’s aim thanks to
army.Because during revolution army did not took side beside regime.
However after took power army lost its
repetition.Same violence,human rights abuse etc.,like regime’s ,was performing
by military regime. A group of protesters started to inform public about this
thread. They said that military regime is not different from Mubarak’s regime,
they are using violence againts protesters, corruption is common among military
leaders, they don’t care about Egyptian’s happiness etc.Protests against
military regime has started.Along this process, hostility against Muslim
Brotherhood has increased among some groups.The reasons of these anti-Muslim
Brotherhood groups for being against İhvan were that they thought that Muslim
Brotherhood betrayed to revolution because they cooperated with military
regime.They embraced the revolution and ignored other protesters after regime
was overthrowned.They used revolution as an tool for seizing power.
I think the punch
line was this separation among revolutionaries.Egyptians took the road by
ignoring their all differences and achieved their goals by solidarity among
themselves.The only thing that brought them these achievements was
unity,togetherness of them.However after Mubarak’s leaving this solidarity gave
place to separations, grudge and hate.Being an islamist party of Muslim
Brotherhood was thought as an thread to Egypt.By focusing on these kind of fake
threads, likeMuslim Brotherhood will bring to country sharia, Egyptians forgot
the main thread and ignored their real,common thread.The real thread for all
Egyptians was actually illegitimate military regime which took power without
elections.
I believe that
Muslim Brotherhood opposition was used
both by military regime and external Powers for strenghtening the military’s
role in Egypt’s politics. Stiring up trouble to revolution’s unity was only way
to stop the awakening. Maybe it can be thougt as conspiracy theory, but this is
impossible to think that external powers did not an actor in this critical term
of Egypt.
I think it is
impossible to put protests for turning over Muslim Brotherhood in the same
equation with protest which are against Mubarak’s regime and military
regime.For this situation we are talking about a legitimate government came
with public’s vote.There were some protesters who think Muslim Brotherhood
government as more dangerous than Mubarak’s regime.The men with whom they
counteract arm in arm against Mubarek’s regime was be seen as primary
enemies for this time.
After the coup
d’etat which overthrown the Ihvan, this time Muslim Brotherhoods take their
place in Tahrir square and the same army which opened fire on anti-İhvan
protesters, opened fire on Muslim Brotherhoods supporters.
In sum ,Egypt was
in a vicious circle.They came to same point, the same point with before January
25 Revolution.The results were thousands of deaths, casualties and wounded
people.The worst part of this vicious circle was that rising again the seperations among
people.Moreover, this time these seperations were so deep.Even both sides, supporters
of Ihvan and anti-İhvan, can be seen as responsible for their killings.
By the way we
should never ignore the wrong approaches of politicians which polarize the
society.If Ihvan follow a more cooperative policy toward opposition groups and
vice versa, the situation may be more recoverable.
The film represents a point of view particularly Egyptian liberals. However, they cannot be objectives when it comes to the Muslim Brotherhood they can be against their own principles same goes with any Egyptian communist. The Egyptian opposition presented by Hamdein Sabahi or Abo Al-Fotouh player their role in dividing the revolutionary movement. But unfortunately only the Muslim Brotherhood will be accused for their mistakes.
YanıtlaSilI'm not defending the Muslim Brotherhood, but we have to bear in mind that, Egyptian liberals or leftists in general cannot be objective when it comes to the Muslim Brotherhood's case.
I agree...
Sil